Legal Opinion

United Feldspar & Minerals Corp. v. Bumpus

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided October 21, 1946PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMurciiie, J.

In this case the plaintiff’s bill of complaint, seeking the cancellation of a 50-year mining lease dated June 1, 1927 on the ground that a covenant to carry on mining operations with reasonable diligence is implicit in any lease providing for rental on a royalty basis where there is no provision for a minimum annual rental, was dismissed by decree dated July 6, 1945 for the assigned reasons that the original parties.to the lease did not contemplate such a requirement; that forfeitures and cancellations are not favored at law or in equity but rest within the discretion and conscience of the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Freeport Sulphur Co. v. American Sulphur Royalty Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Shenandoah Land & Anthracite Coal Co. v. HiseSupreme Court of Virginia · 1895
  3. Chandler v. FrenchWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Millar v. MauneySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1921
  5. Maxwell v. . ToddSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ionno v. Glen-Gery Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Carter v. Certain-Teed Products Corp.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API