Comstock v. Smith
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Lenawee Circuit.
1Opinion of the Court
¡Grates, J.
This controversy relates to the same purchase which *308gave rise to the litigation between these parties, reported in 20 Mich., 338; but the demand now in question is a different one. a
The “claim” advanced on this record was set up in the probate court as a contingent one, and was there rejected. The claimant, Mrs. Smith, appealed to the circuit court, and upon an issue made up in that court, and tried before a jury, a verdict was rendered establishing her right.
The case is now brought to this court by the administrator, who alleges numerous errors. It is believed, however, that many…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Pennock v. DialogueSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
- Van Renesselaer v. KearneySupreme Court of the United States · 1851
- Freeman v. . AuldNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
- Hartley v. . HarrisonNew York Court of Appeals · 1861
- Thorp v. . the Keokuk Coal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1872
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Dean v. WalkerIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
- Crawford v. EdwardsMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
- First National Bank v. FordWyoming Supreme Court · 1923
- Patrick v. HowardMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
- Cache County ex rel. Matthews v. JensenUtah Supreme Court · 1900
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.