Legal Opinion

Diversified Numismatics, Inc. v. City of Orlando

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided December 27, 1991No. 90-3914PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellants challenge the district court’s refusal to recuse and its grant of summary judgment to the defendants/appellees. We affirm.

As a preliminary matter, we note that appellees have moved to strike certain portions of appellants’ brief and for sanctions, because the brief refers to newspaper articles not presented to the district court. We agree that appellants should not have referenced material not in the record, and we will not consider any non-record evidence or arguments based upon non-record evidence. However, appellees also committed serious error in their brief, by failing to cite…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. O'Shea v. LittletonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. In Re Diana R. Beard, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Duha v. Agrium, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  2. Bivens Gardens Office Building, Inc. v. Barnett Banes of Florida, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
  3. JOhnny Traylor v. Partnership Title Company, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012
  4. The Indigo Room, Inc. v. City of Fort MyersCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2013
  5. Doe v. MarshallDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2019

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API