Legal Opinion · Dissent

Duha v. Agrium, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided May 23, 2006No. 04-2505, 04-2548Published

1Dissent

R. GUY COLE, JR., Circuit Judge,

dissenting.

I believe that the majority incorrectly applies the clear abuse-of-discretion standard of review and does not properly follow the Supreme Court’s and our precedent in forum non conveniens cases. Therefore, I respectfully dissent.

I. Standard of Review

While the majority opinion acknowledges that we review a district court’s forum non conveniens determination for abuse of discretion, it then proceeds, in my view, to engage in a de 'novo review. I believe that, while the majority acknowledges the proper standard of review, they have “lost sight of this…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Koster v. (American) Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. Norwood v. KirkpatrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1955

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API