Duha v. Agrium, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Dissent
R. GUY COLE, JR., Circuit Judge,
dissenting.
I believe that the majority incorrectly applies the clear abuse-of-discretion standard of review and does not properly follow the Supreme Court’s and our precedent in forum non conveniens cases. Therefore, I respectfully dissent.
I. Standard of Review
While the majority opinion acknowledges that we review a district court’s forum non conveniens determination for abuse of discretion, it then proceeds, in my view, to engage in a de 'novo review. I believe that, while the majority acknowledges the proper standard of review, they have “lost sight of this…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Koster v. (American) Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Norwood v. KirkpatrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.