Legal Opinion
Forrer v. Buckeye Speedway, Inc., 07ca0027 (9-22-2008)
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided September 22, 2008No. 07CA0027UnpublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY
INTRODUCTION
{¶ 1} Stockcar races are noisy. In 1987, five couples and one individual, all of whom lived within a mile from what was then known as Buckeye Speedway, sued the speedway's then owner claiming that the speedway was a nuisance. The parties reached a settlement, and the trial court, in May 1988, entered a stipulated judgment entry that limited the number of practices and races that could be held at the speedway and limited the days of the week and hours of the day during which those practices and races could be held.
{¶ 2} During both 1991 and 1993,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- International Union, United Mine Workers v. BagwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Hicks Ex Rel. Feiock v. FeiockSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Brown v. Executive 200, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1980
- Windham Bank v. TomaszczykOhio Supreme Court · 1971
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. FleschOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
- State v. HayesOhio Court of Appeals · 2023