Legal Opinion

Helmer v. Nagle

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 28, 1938No. 31,465PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Julius J. Olson, Justice.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment entered pursuant to an order dismissing his cause for lack of prosecution.

The significant dates of events leading to the present appeal may be summarized in this fashion: The alleged causes of action arose not later than September, 1929. In March, 1931, plaintiff commenced this action, and during the same month defendant answered, so that from then on the cause has been at issue. On April 1 the first note of issue was served and filed. On October 26, nest following, the case was set for trial but was continued on plaintiff’s motion.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wheeler v. WhitneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
  2. McGurren v. Noyes Bros. & CutlerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Conrad v. Certified Ice & Fuel Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  4. Northwestern Malleable Iron Co. v. McMahonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Simkins v. BechtolSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API