Legal Opinion

Bryden v. Bryden

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1814PublishedCited by 9 opinions

THIS was an action of assumpsit brought against the defendant, as endorser of a bill of exchange. The cause was tried before the Chief Justice, at the New-York sittings, in November, 1813. The bill of exchange was dated at Baltimore, the 23d July, 1799, drawn by C. F. C. Busche on J. A- and D. IT. Rucker, Esqs. of London, for 120 pounds sterling, at sixty days’ sight, in favour of William Magruder, who endorsed it to the defendant, who endorsed it to the plaintiff.

Read the full summary

THIS was an action of assumpsit brought against the defendant, as endorser of a bill of exchange. The cause was tried before the Chief Justice, at the New-York sittings, in November, 1813. The bill of exchange was dated at Baltimore, the 23d July, 1799, drawn by C. F. C. Busche on J. A- and D. IT. Rucker, Esqs. of London, for 120 pounds sterling, at sixty days’ sight, in favour of William Magruder, who endorsed it to the defendant, who endorsed it to the plaintiff. The first of the set of exchange which had been protested, was lost with the vessel in which it *■ 7 was sent, in its passage…

1Opinion of the CourtSpences, J.

Taylor, the holder of the bill, and the defendant, the endorser, both resided in the" city of Baltimore. The only evidence of the non-acceptance of the bill is the deposition of Taylor, who states that within three clays after the receipt of the letter advising him of the non-acceptance of the bill, he gave verbal notice thereof to the defendant. He also directed Payne, his clerk, who is since dead, to give notice to the defendant, who afterwards acknowledged to Taylor that he had received such- notice from Payne ; but when Payne • gave the notice does not appear. Tt is presumable, however,…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Roth v. . Buffalo State Line R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1866
  2. Roberts v. MastersIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Brewster v. ArnoldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1853
  4. Lamb v. Camden & Amboy Railroad & Transportation Co.New York Court of Common Pleas · 1869
  5. Kelty v. Second National BankNew York Supreme Court · 1868

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API