Legal Opinion

Newman v. Ernst

The Superior Court of New York City

Decided April 15, 1890Published

Motion for a new trial upon the minutes of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHatch, J.

This action was brought to recover damages for the lulling of plaintiff’s horse, on Main street in Buffalo. From the facts developed upon the trial it appeared that plaintiff’s horse was being driven by an intending purchaser for the purpose of examination and trial. At the time of the accident he was driving upon the right hand side of Main street going south. In the center of Main street is laid two lines of street railway tracks, leaving a driveway on either side sufficient in width for ordinary vehicles to meet and pass. Defendant was driving northerly on the same side as plaintiff. As…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Greenfield v. . People of the State of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. Erben v. . LorillardNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  3. Linsday v. . People of the State of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1875
  4. Neil v. . ThornNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  5. Mandeville v. GuernseyNew York Supreme Court · 1865

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API