Legal Opinion

United States v. Trimper

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided March 23, 1988No. ACM 26211PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

HODGSON, Chief Judge:

The paramount issue before us is one of first impression: Is the prosecution required to disclose to the defense under R.C.M. 701 the nature and extent of its rebuttal evidence? Appellate defense *535counsel argue that R.C.M. 701 should be broadly interpreted to include all evidence within the government’s possession so as to preclude “trial by ambush.” With surprising candor, they argue that such a disclosure requirement would permit “... an accused to be more circumspect in [his] testimony, limit it to the matters at hand and not make broad statements which may be…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. Seymour Pollack, United States of America v. Paul M. Sachs, United States of America v. William CuddCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
  3. United States v. William Michael Elam, Richard Victor Jennings, Jr., George Anthony Seek and William Lykergus Miller, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  4. United States v. Leonard Crow DogCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
  5. United States v. DugaUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. TrimperUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
  2. United States v. CannonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991
  3. United States v. SloanU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1990
  4. United States v. AdensArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API