Legal Opinion
Bliss v. Anaconda Copper Mining Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Montana
Decided April 26, 1909No. 280PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUNT, District Judge,
Pursuant to the order of the court heretofore made on January 25, 1909, hearing was had on February 15th, in order that the court might listen to the testimony of the superintendent of the Washoe Smelting Company, and such testimony as the parties chose to present upon the subject of possible means of so treating the flue dust at defendants’ smelting works as to reduce the quantities of arsenic passing out' of its stack, and thereafter making any such specific order as might seem equitable and right. Bliss v. Anaconda Copper Mining Co. et al. (C. C.) 167 Fed. 342.
In…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Kansas v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Georgia v. Tennesssee Copper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
- The " Scotland"Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Dun v. Lumbermen's Credit Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
- American Smelting & Refining Co. v. GodfreyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Chicago Sugar Co. v. American Sugar Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1949
- Popeil Brothers, Inc. v. Schick Electric, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
- Gold Dust Corporation v. HoffenbergCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
- Union Industrielle Et Maritime v. Nimpex International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972
- Kederick v. HeintzlemanDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1956
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.