Legal Opinion

Bonney v. San Antonio Transit Company

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 8, 1958No. 13348PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARROW, Justice.

In the original opinion, prepared by Chief Justice Murray, we reversed and remanded the case on the ground that the evidence was insufficient to support the jury’s finding that the plaintiff was engaged in a joint enterprise. Appellant has filed a motion for rehearing in which he contends that we were in error in holding the evidence insufficient, and that we should have reversed and rendered the case on the ground that there was no evidence to support the finding. We have reconsidered the record and have reached the conclusion that not only is there some evidence, but…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. El Paso Electric Co. v. LeeperTexas Commission of Appeals · 1933
  2. Mortensen v. MortensenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1945
  3. Le Sage v. PryorTexas Commission of Appeals · 1941
  4. Lesage v. PryorTexas Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Murphy v. KeatingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bonney v. San Antonio Transit CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Fuller v. FlanaganCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
  3. Withers v. StimmelCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962
  4. WANDA PETROLEUM COMPANY v. HahnCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
  5. Bonney v. San Antonio Transit CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API