Gandy Belting Co. v. Victor-Balata & Textile Belting Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
In Equity. Suit by the Gandy Belting Company against the VictorBalata & Textile Belting Company, for infringement of an alleged trade-mark and for unlawful competition. On bill, answer, and proofs. The following are the findings of fact and conclusions of law referred to in the opinion: Findings of Fact. The coxu't in the above case finds the following facts at hearing on bill, answer, ¡nid proofs adduced at trial. (1) The plaintiff is a citizen of the state of Maryland.
Read the full summary
In Equity. Suit by the Gandy Belting Company against the VictorBalata & Textile Belting Company, for infringement of an alleged trade-mark and for unlawful competition. On bill, answer, and proofs. The following are the findings of fact and conclusions of law referred to in the opinion: Findings of Fact. The coxu't in the above case finds the following facts at hearing on bill, answer, ¡nid proofs adduced at trial. (1) The plaintiff is a citizen of the state of Maryland. The defendant is a citizen of the state of Pennsylvania. The matter in controversy exceeds in value, exclusive of interest…
1Opinion of the Court
DICKINSON, District Judge.
Specific findings of facts and conclusions of law, so far as are necessary to the ruling of the case now made, are filed herewith.
It is not altogether easy to find a phrase which will accurately present the precise points involved in a decision of this case. The facts themselves may be soon stated, and are not in serious dispute. The general questions involved relate to charges of unfair competition and infringement of a proprietary trade-mark.
The plaintiff and defendant each is a manufacturer of canvas belting as a substitute for leather. The methods of manufacture…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Lufkin Rule Co. v. Master Rule Mfg. Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
- In re Gotham Silk Hosiery Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1927