Legal Opinion

People v. Vendome Service, Inc.

New York City Magistrates' Court

Decided May 19, 1939PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Aurelio, C. M.

The facts in this case are conceded. The jurisdiction of the municipality and the State over the premises, however, is challenged.

In March, 1938, the United States purchased the premises Nos. 2-4 LaSalle street, New York, N. Y., with the consent of the State of New York, and pending the construction of a post office thereon, leased a certain portion of the building to the defendant for the purpose of storing motor vehicles.

This prosecution is for the defendant’s failure to secure the permit required by section C19-64.0, of the Administrative Code of the City of New York, which…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fort Leavenworth Railroad v. LoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. United States v. UnzeutaSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  3. Arlington Hotel Co. v. FantSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  4. Battle v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  5. Palmer v. BarrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1896

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. Vendome Service Corp.New York City Magistrates' Court · 1942
  2. Informal Opinion No., New York Attorney General Reports1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API