Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State ex rel. Curry v. Monroe

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 13, 1953No. Nos. 33332 and 33355Published

1ConcurrenceTaft, J.

If, as a result of the auditor performing his duty, pursuant to Section 5615, General Code, any property is valued at more than it lawfully should be, a taxpayer, who is affected by such over-valuation, is given adequate remedies to protect his interests. Hammond, Treas., v. Winder, Recr., 112 Ohio St., 158, 147 N. E., 94. See, also, Hammond, Treas., v. Winder, Recr., 100 Ohio St., 433, 446, 126 N. E., 409, 24 A. L. R., 318.

To allow the writ prayed for in the instant case would be to enable parties, who will not be affected adversely by any such over-valuations, to substitute the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hammond v. WinderOhio Supreme Court · 1925
  2. State v. CabcOhio Supreme Court · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API