Legal Opinion
A.C.E. Construction Inc. v. Chena Construction Corp.
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided July 9, 1982No. Nos. 5664, 5682PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
This case arises under a construction contract. Appellants will be referred to collectively as “Pacific Cascade” and appellee will be referred to as “Chena”. Chena was a subcontractor on the project in question.
Ultimately, after a trial to the court, judgment was entered in favor of Chena, for the subcontract price. Pacific Cascade does not challenge the propriety of awarding to Chena the subcontract price. But it has appealed as to two discrete issues. These are: (1) whether Chena had corporate capacity to sue under AS 10.05.720, which requires that a corporation, in order to commence…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- Mather Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1973
- American Land Development Corporation v. HillmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
- Michigan Rural Development, Inc. v. El Mac Hills Resort, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1971
4Cited by1 opinion
- ITMO Protective Proceedings of Macon J.Alaska Supreme Court · 2025