Fleming v. Gemein
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne; Donovan, J. Case by Jennie Fleming against John J. Gt-emein for unlawful sales of intoxicating liquor to plaintiff’s husband. A judgment for plaintiff for six cents is reviewed by plaintiff on writ of error.
1Opinion of the CourtAlva y, J.
Plaintiff sued defendant, who was engaged, in the city of Detroit, in the business of conducting a saloon as a retail liquor dealer, under the statute, claiming damages for unlawfully selling malt, brewed, spirituous, and intoxicating liquors to her husband, who became and was an habitual drunkard to the knowledge of defendant, and after the defendant had been notified by her verbally and in writing not to sell to her husband, for the reason that he was an habitual drinker, and an habitual drunkard. There is no question raised as to the sufficiency of the declaration in the case. The case was…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Rawle v. McIlhennySupreme Court of Virginia · 1934
- Clark v. SpurdisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
- Rawle v. McIlhennySupreme Court of Virginia · 1934
- Walker v. BrittonMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
- Galvan v. SummersMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.