Legal Opinion

Doering v. Selby

Montana Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1926No. 5,842PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Matthews

On March 6, 1920, plaintiff, Caroline Doering, filed herein her complaint seeking the foreclosure of a certain chattel mortgage and for judgment against the defendants A. Clark Selby and Prances W. Selby, his wife, for the amount due on the note secured by such mortgage, and for judgment against the defendant Leavitt for damages for the conversion of certain property described in said mortgage. Personal service of summons was had on Leavitt and substituted service thereof upon the Selbys. The Selbys defaulted, and their default was duly entered. Leavitt filed an answer which is in effect a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Esper v. BurnsMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Hodson v. O'KeeffeMontana Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Hennessy Co. v. WagnerMontana Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Lee v. LaugheryMontana Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Cuerth v. ArbogastMontana Supreme Court · 1913

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Standard Oil Co. v. Idaho Community Oil Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Harvey E. Mack Co. v. RyanMontana Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Herd v. FreemanMontana Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Central Bank & Trust Co. v. Lee C. Nelson, Inc.District Court, D. Montana · 1963
  5. Kransky v. HensleighMontana Supreme Court · 1965

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API