Duarte v. Atkinson
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
Ralph and Michael Duarte appeal the decision of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel (“BAP”) affirming the bankruptcy court’s entry of judgment as a matter of law on the Duartes’ adversary complaint and holding that a California state court judgment was not excepted from discharge pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2)(A). See Fed. R. Bankr.P. 7052(c); Fed.R.Civ.P. 52(c). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 158(d) and 1291, and we affirm.
We review the BAP’s decision de novo and independently review the bankruptcy court’s rulings. Ardmor Vending Co. v. Kim (In re Kim), 130 F.3d…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- David Singer v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- American Title Insurance Company v. Lacelaw CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- In Re: Charles Michael Harmon, Debtor. Charles Michael Harmon v. Donald KobrinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- In Re Hassan Hamidi Hashemi, Debtor. American Express Travel Related Services Company Inc. v. Hassan Hamidi HashemiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Lectrodryer v. SeoulBankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- SWINGLESS GOLF CLUB CORPORATION v. TaylorDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2009