Legal Opinion

Welch v. Arney

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1950PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLusk, C. J.

Bespondent has moved to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the notice of appeal was served by the appellant himself. He contends that such service by a party to an action or suit is not authorized by statute and is a nullity.

The respondent’s position is supported by Keeley v. Keeley, 97 Or. 597, 182 P. 490; Muckle v. Columbia County, 56 Or. 146, 108 P. 120; and Williams v. Schmidt, 14 Or. 470, 13 P. 305. But in Storm v. Thompson, 155 Or. 686, 690, 64 P. (2d) 1309, the court said obiter that “the service may be made by the party himself, his attorney, or any qualified and competent third…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. First Nat. Bank v. WegenerOregon Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Storm v. ThompsonOregon Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Muckle v. Columbia CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Williams v. SchmidtOregon Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Marion County v. StanfieldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1859

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Curtis v. StoneOregon Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Veden v. McFallOregon Supreme Court · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API