Legal Opinion
Cidlik v. Subsurface Contractors
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided July 22, 2003No. ED 81858PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOOKER T. SHAW, Judge.
Subsurface Contractors (“Employer”) appeals from an order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (the “Commission”) dismissing its Application for Review (“Application”) because it was filed untimely. The Commission determined that because the date endorsed by the United States Postal Service on the envelope containing Employer’s Application was illegible, the Commission was required to utilize the date the Application was actually received as its filing date, and therefore, found that the Application was received untimely under Section 287.470, RSMo 2000.1 We…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Abrams v. Ohio Pacific ExpressSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
- State Ex Rel. McNary v. HaisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1984
- Anthony P. Skolski and Kathryne D. Skolski v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1965
- Bernard Bloch v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
- Tidwell v. Kloster Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1999
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Dixon v. Stoam Industries, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2006
- Maryann Gray, Respondent/Cross-Appellant v. Hawthorn Children's Psychiatric Hospital/State of Missouri, Appellant/Cross-Respondent, and Treasurer of the State of Missouri, as Custodian of the Second Injury FundSupreme Court of Missouri · 2023