Clugston v. Moore
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EUBANK, Judge.
The issue raised by this appeal is whether a defendant, who has done nothing that would cause a default judgment to be entered against her, may have summary judgment entered against her based solely on the default judgment entered against a codefendant. We conclude that the trial court erred in entering the summary judgment against appellant and we reverse and remand the case to the trial court.
The procedural history of this case is as follows. Plaintiff-Appellee Jim Ray Clugston filed suit against defendant Martin Joseph Burke to specifically enforce an oral agreement…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Frow v. De La VegaSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- In Re Uranium Antitrust Litigation. Westinghouse Electric CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
- Di Orio v. City of ScottsdaleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
- Fawkes v. National Refining Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1937
- Grain Dealers Mutual Insurance v. JamesArizona Supreme Court · 1978
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Francini v. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
- Best v. CejaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
- Jes Solar Company Limited v. Matinee Energy IncorporatedDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2019