Dippin' Dots, Inc. v. Frosty Bites Distribution, LLC
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
DUBINA, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiff-Appellant Dippiri Dots, Inc. (“DDI”) brought suit against Defendants Appellee Frosty Bites Distribution, LLC (“FBD”) alleging trade dress infringement of DDI’s product design and logo design, both in violation of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of FBD on both claims. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the judgment of the district court.
I. BACKGROUND
A. Facts
Plaintiff DDI markets and sells a brightly-colored flash-frozen ice cream product, called “dippiri dots,” consisting of free flowing small spheres or…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Inwood Laboratories, Inc. v. Ives Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Brookfield Communications, Inc. v. West Coast Entertainment CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Bonito Boats, Inc. v. Thunder Craft Boats, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Qualitex Co. v. Jacobson Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- TrafFix Devices, Inc. v. Marketing Displays, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by98 opinions
- Rolando Gus Paez v. Secretary, Florida Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020
- Tana v. Dantanna'sCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
- Welding Services, Inc. v. FormanCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
- Au-Tomotive Gold, Inc. v. Volkswagen of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Dippin' Dots v. Mosey v. Esty, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.