Legal Opinion
State v. Roy
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided December 16, 2002No. 2001-429PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDalianis, J.
The defendant, Steven Roy, appeals a Superior Court (McHugh, J.) order denying his motion for a new trial based upon a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. We affirm.
This is the second time this case has reached us on appeal. See State v. Roy, 140 N.H. 478 (1995) (Roy I). In summarizing the relevant facts of this case, we incorporate by reference the facts detailed in Roy I.
In Roy I, we affirmed the trial court’s refusal to grant a mistrial after the prosecution questioned its lead investigator regarding inadmissible statements made by C.J. Kelley, a non-testifying witness. Id. at 483.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Richardson v. MarshSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Frazier v. CuppSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- State v. BallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
- State v. FortierSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. KeppleSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
- State v. FlynnSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
- Roy v. Coplan, NHSPDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2004
- Roy v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 2003