Burgraf v. Byrnes
Supreme Court of Minnesota
After the decision on the second appeal herein, the case was tried in the-district Court for Meeker county before Powers, J., and a jury which returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff for $223.14. From an order granting defendant’s motion for a new trial, plaintiff appealed.
1Per curiam
This cause was here on two former appeals. 94 Minn. 418, 103 N. W. 215; 99 Minn. 517, 109 N. W. 1132. The first appeal involved the sufficiency of the complaint, and the second was from an order granting defendant a new trial on the ground of surprise and excusable neglect. It is now hereon plaintiff’s appeal from an order granting defendant a new trial on the grounds (1) of errors in law occurring at the trial, and (2) that the verdict for plaintiff was not justified by the evidence.
The case requires no extended opinion. We discover no errors in the rulings of the court sufficient to justify…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Wood v. CullenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1868
- Burgraf v. ByrnesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
3Cited by2 opinions
- Burgraf v. ByrnesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
- Melin v. StuartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913