Legal Opinion

Richardson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 8, 2017No. CASE NO. 1D16-4778PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Ivan Richardson appeals the trial court’s finding that he violated probation and the resulting prison sentence. Richardson represented'himself for both the VOP hearing and the sentencing hearing held immediately after. While the court conducted a sufficient Faretta * inquiry before the violation hearing, it failed to renew the offer of counsel before sentencing. Therefore, we vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing. See Cuyler v. State, 131 So.3d 827, 828 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014) (‘While a full Faretta inquiry need not be conducted at every stage of criminal proceedings, once counsel has…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Cuyler v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hinson v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2025
  2. Hinson v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API