Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. Elson

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided December 7, 2010No. AC 31511Published

1ConcurrenceDupont, J.

I concur in the majority opinion and agree that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. I write separately to express my disagreement with the majority’s interpretation of the meaning of “affirmative request” as used by our Supreme Court in order to determine whether a defendant can obtain review pursuant to State v. Golding, 213 Conn. 233,239-40, 567 A.2d 823 (1989), of a claimed constitutional deprivation that was not preserved at trial, and with the majority’s decision to overrule in part State v. Wright, 114 Conn. App. 448, 969 A.2d 827 (2009).1

This appeal was first argued in…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  2. State v. EvansSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
  3. State v. ThurmanConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987
  4. State v. AlvarezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  5. State v. McKenzie-AdamsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API