Legal Opinion
Michael G. Stag, LLC v. Stuart H. Smith, LLC
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Decided August 26, 2021No. 2:18-cv-03425Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MICHAEL G. STAG, L.L.C., ET AL. * CIVIL ACTION VERSUS * NO. 18-3425 c/w 20-991 STUART H. SMITH, L.L.C., ET AL. * SECTION “A” (2) ORDER AND REASONS The parties’ cross-motions regarding Rule 30(a)(2)(A)(i)’s presumptive 10 depositions per side limit are before me. See ECF Nos. 394; 410. Defendants Stuart H. Smith, LLC and Stuart H. Smith seek leave to take two additional depositions in excess of the 10 deposition limit (ECF No. 410) and Plaintiffs Michael G. Stag, L.L.C., Smith Stag, L.L.C., and Michael G. Stag seek to quash and/or…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Seattle Times Co. v. RhinehartSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Herbert v. LandoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- John A. Pansy v. Borough of Stroudsburg Harold A. Bentzoni Kathryn Mikels John W. Osborne, II William Reber Mary Jean Knapik Maryann West Kowalshyn Richard F. Osswald Carl R. Rogers v. Ottaway Newspapers, Inc. T/a Pocono Record, Ronald F. Bouchard Pennsylvania Newspaper Publishers Association, Intervenors/appellantsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- In Re Terra International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.