Young v. Wolfe
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. This cause comes here on appeal from a decree of the United States Circuit Court for the Southern District of New York adjudicating the validity and infringement by defendant of patent No. 638,-540, granted to complainant December 5, 1899, for a hose supporter, and ordering an injunction and accounting.
1Opinion of the Court
TOWNSEND, Circuit Judge.
The defenses of insufficiency of the specification, anticipation, lack of patentability, and prior use were raised in the court below, and disposed of in an opinion which critically discusses the status of the patent and the material evidence relevant to said defenses. We fully concur with the court in its conclusions.
But it was strenuously argued on this appeal that certain prior patents, which were not referred to by the court below in its opinion, especially Minthorn patent No. 13,011, of 1855, Porter patent No. 99,347, of 1870, and the George patent No. 208,387, of…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Ruben Condenser Co. v. Copeland Refrigeration Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1935
- Foster Hose Supporter Co. v. O'BrienU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1907
- O'Brien v. Foster Hose Supporter Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1907