Legal Opinion

P. L. Saddler v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided March 1, 1961No. 202-57PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DURFEE, Judge.

This is a claim for contract damages based on a change order issued by defendant which the plaintiff maintains required work to be done which was outside the scope of the contract. The con tract in suit, entered into on April 23, 1951, required the plaintiff to provide the materials and labor necessary for the construction of a levee embankment on the Methow River, near Twisp, Washington. As originally written, it was a unit price contract calling for the placing of estimated quantities of embankment, back-fill, and stone riprap. The quantities and unit prices are set out in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. General Contracting & Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1937
  2. Magoba Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1943

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Wunderlich Contracting Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
  2. J. D. Hedin Construction Company, Inc., for Its Own Use and for the Use of Fischbach & Moore, Its Sub-Contractor v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
  3. James A. Boyajian, Assignee of Triumph Manufacturing Company, Bankrupt v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
  4. Laburnum Construction Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
  5. Becho, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API