Legal Opinion

United States v. Kottwitz

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided December 22, 2010No. 08-13740PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendants/Appellants have petitioned for rehearing. We have considered Defendants’ arguments and the Government’s reply. And we have looked at the record again. We stand by our decision, United States v. Kottwitz, 614 F.3d 1241 (11th Cir.2010), except on the issue of the accountant-reliance jury instruction for Count One.

Defendants contend that the district court erred in refusing to give Defendants their requested jury instruction about reliance on an accountant’s advice. In our original decision, we concluded that this refusal constituted reversible error on Counts Three, Four, and Five.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. AdkinsonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
  2. United States v. Lorentz G. OpdahlCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
  3. United States v. KottwitzCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. United States v. Chris VernonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2013
  2. United States v. Patricia Lynn HoughCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015
  3. United States v. Kimberly HornerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2017
  4. United States v. Perez-RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2021
  5. United States v. Blaine JohnstonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API