State v. Hydrite Chemical Co.
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtVergeront, J.
¶ 1. The primary issue on this appeal is whether the circuit court correctly determined that, based on the undisputed facts, the known loss doctrine precluded coverage for Hydrite Chemical Company under its excess liability policies for losses resulting from liability for groundwater contamination. We conclude that, when the insurance policy involved is an excess liability policy, the known loss doctrine bars coverage only when the insured knows there is a substantial probability that its liability to a third party will reach the excess layer.1 Applying that standard, we *653conclude there are…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Outboard Marine Corp. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
- Green Spring Farms v. KerstenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
- Grams v. BossWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- American Family Mutual Insurance v. American Girl, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- PUD DISTRICT NO. 1, KLICKITAT COUNTY v. International Insurance Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1994
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Admiral Insurance v. Paper Converting Machine Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2012
- American Medical Security, Inc. v. Executive Risk Specialty InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2005
- NCR Corp. v. Transport InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2012
- Wosinski v. Advance Cast Stone Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2017
- American Family Mutual Insurance v. BatemanCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.