Legal Opinion · Dissent

City of Corpus Christi v. City of Pleasanton

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 9, 1955No. A-4543Published

1DissentJustice Griffin

The majority opinion determines the question of whether or not “waste” is present in this case by considering only the amount of water that reaches its destination, rather than by considering the total amount of water produced at the mouth of the well. This is clearly error, and to so consider the question of waste, is to wholly ignore the expressed purpose of the conservation amendment. If no consideration is to be given the amount of water that is dissipated between the time of its production and time of use, then we can never have waste.

The fallacy of the majority opinion is easily…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Hudson County Water Co. v. McCarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Brown v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Ohio Oil Company v. IndianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  5. Thompson v. Consolidated Gas Utilities Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API