State v. Anderson

This cause came on to be heard upon an appeal from the Court of Common Pleas of Hamilton County.

In his two assignments of error, defendant-appellant, Clarence Anderson, contends that his conviction of possessing criminal tools in violation of R.C. 2923.24 1 was contrary to the manifest weight of the evidence because the state failed to prove intent to use the two tire irons criminally, and that he should have been acquitted of two counts of theft (R.C. 2913.02) and of one count of receiving stolen property (R.C. 2913.51) because the evidence was insufficient to sustain convictions of those…