Legal Opinion

State v. Deffenbacher

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 15, 1872PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from, Ripley Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtWagner, Judge

It is unnecessary to examine the objections urged to the rulings of the court on the trial, as we think the indictment is defective, and the motion in arrest should haye been sustained. The defend*27ant was indicted under the statute (Wagn. Stat. 462, § 55) for willfully and maliciously lulling a hull; but there was no allegation in the indictment that the act was done feloniously.

The section provides that upon conviction the punishment for the act shall be as declared in the next preceding section; namely, “Imprisonment in the penitentiary not exceeding three years, or in the county jail not…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Johnston v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1841
  2. State v. MurdockSupreme Court of Missouri · 1846

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. FairlambSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
  2. Kaelin v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1886
  3. State v. MeltonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
  4. State v. McGrathSupreme Court of Missouri · 1910
  5. State v. VonderauSupreme Court of Missouri · 1969

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API