Legal Opinion

Byrum v. Pharo

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 20, 1941No. 6 Div. 817PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, Justice.

The appellee, Pharo, a judgment creditor of B. S. Byrum, sued out a writ of garnishment on his judgment citing Wilma Decker as garnishee. The garnishee answered that she was indebted to the judgment defendant in the sum of two hundred dollars, alleging that she had been notified that J. M. McGill, J. M. Ratliff, Enos C. Lewis and F. M. Burns claimed title to or interest in money in her hands, which she payed into court.

The clerk of the court thereupon issued notice to said claimants to appear within thirty days after service of the notice and propound their claims, as required…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. McClurkin v. McClurkinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  2. Wefel v. StillmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
  3. Thornton v. Highland Avenue & Belt RailroadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1891
  4. Brooks v. Continental InsuranceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1899
  5. Diamond Rubber Co. v. Fourth National BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Bland v. St. JohnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
  2. Gober v. City of BirminghamAlabama Court of Appeals · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API