Legal Opinion

State v. Huff

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided April 9, 2002No. AC 21041PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DRANGINIS, J.

The defendant, Lenwood Huff, appeals from the judgment of conviction rendered following his plea of nolo contendere to the crime of sale of a narcotic substance with intent to sell by a person who is not drug-dependent in violation of General Statutes § 21a-278 (b).1 On appeal, the defendant claims *53that the court improperly denied his motion to suppress because the police (1) violated the “knock and announce” rule before entering his apartment and (2) illegally served a copy of the search warrant. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The following facts are relevant…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  2. State v. RuscoeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  3. State v. HarveyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
  4. State v. BeliveauConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
  5. State v. NievesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Strobel v. StrobelConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
  2. State v. $7379.54 United States CurrencyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API