Legal Opinion

AVT New Jersey v. Cubitac Corp

District Court, D. Utah

Decided November 4, 2020No. 2:19-cv-00662Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH AVT NEW JERSEY, L.P., MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S Plaintiff, MOTION FOR WRIT OF REPLEVIN AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION v. FOR WRIT OF ATTACHMENT CUBITAC CORP., and YOEL WEISS, Case No. 2:19-cv-00662-JNP Defendants. District Judge Jill N. Parrish Before the court is Plaintiff’s motion for a prejudgment writ of replevin and a prejudgment writ of attachment. Plaintiff brings this motion under Rule 64 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The court GRANTS the motion for a writ of replevin and DENIES the motion…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. J.M.W. v. T.I.Z.Utah Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Aequitas Enters., LLC v. Interstate Investment Group, LLCUtah Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Pugh v. StrattonUtah Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Kitchen v. Boyd (In Re Newpower)District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1999
  5. Nielsen v. HylandUtah Supreme Court · 1918

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API