Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Houston

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 21, 2000PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

The judgment on the aggravated rape is affirmed. For the reasons articulated by the Appeals Court, Commonwealth v. Houston, 46 Mass. App. Ct. 378, 383 (1999), the judgment on the kidnapping charge is reversed, the verdict is set aside, and the indictment is dismissed.

So ordered.

Separate opinions of Chief Justice Marshall, with whom Justices Abrams and Greaney join; Justice Lynch, with whom Justice Ireland joins; and Justice Cowin appear below.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Commonwealth v. HoustonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1999

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. GregoryWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Commonwealth v. HarrisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
  3. Commonwealth v. GentileMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
  4. Dolinger v. HallCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
  5. Commonwealth v. RahimMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API