Legal Opinion

City of Farmington v. Sandoval

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided March 1, 1977No. 2816PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WOOD, Chief Judge.

The municipal court convicted defendant of violating two Farmington ordinances. He appealed to the district court. After an evidentiary hearing, defendant was again convicted of the ordinance violations. Defendant now appeals the district court judgment. He claims: (1) the evidence was insufficient for conviction, and (2) the district court improperly imposed a sentence greater than the sentence imposed by the municipal court. Because the second claim has not been previously decided by New Mexico appellate courts, Farmington’s motion for summary affirmance is denied.

Th…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Blackledge v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Colten v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Chaffin v. StynchcombeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. People v. HendersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State v. SparksNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. State v. MartinNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. State v. FosterNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. Doe v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. State v. LyonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1985

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API