Legal Opinion

Rogers v. Besthoff

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 11, 1994No. 93-2709Published

1Opinion of the Court

BARFIELD, Judge.

The plaintiffs deposition testimony demonstrates that she cannot prove an element necessary to succeed in her negligence action against the drug store: that the hazardous condition which caused her fall was created by a store employee, or that the store knew of the existence of the hazardous condition, or that the hazardous condition had existed for a sufficient length of time prior to her fall that the store should have known of its existence. Summary judgment was therefore proper. See Food Fair Stores of Florida, Inc. v. Patty, 109 So.2d 5 (Fla.1959); Connolly v. Sebeco,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Food Fair Stores, Inc. v. TrusellSupreme Court of Florida · 1961
  2. Connolly v. Sebeco, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1956
  3. Food Fair Stores of Florida, Inc. v. PattySupreme Court of Florida · 1959
  4. Schaap v. Publix Supermarkets, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  5. Haynes v. LloydDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API