Legal Opinion

Namisnak v. Martin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 20, 1997PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Barbara Kapnick, J.), entered January 6, 1997, denying defendants-appellants’ motion for summary judgment in a negligence action arising out of a two-vehicle collision, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and summary judgment granted to defendants - app ell ants. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of defendants-appellants dismissing the complaint.

At about 7:00 a.m. on December 2, 1993, defendant-respondent, Michael Namisnak, Sr. (“Michael, Sr.”), was driving an automobile in the eastbound lanes of Hempstead Turnpike in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Friends of Animals, Inc. v. Associated Fur Manufacturers, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Ward v. . ClarkNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
  4. DeAngelis v. KischnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  5. Anastasio v. ScheerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Nevarez v. S.R.M. Management Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  2. Perez v. Brux Cab Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. Stiles v. County of DutchessAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  4. Cenovski v. LeeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  5. Kelsey v. DeganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API