East Omaha Street Railway Co. v. Godola
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error from the district court of Douglas county. Tried below before Keysor, J.
1Opinion of the CourtPost, C. J.
The East Omaha Street Railway Company, hereafter called the defendant, is engaged in operating a suburban railway by means of electricity, the initial point of its line of road being Sherman avenue, near the eastern boundary of the city of Omaha, and its terminus at Courtland Beach, between four and five miles distant. Prom Sherman avenue the course of the defendant’s track is due east, along what is described as Locust street, to a point about midway between the city and the Missouri river, from whence it extends north to Courtland Beach. On the 6th day of August, 1893, as alleged by the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Nolan v. . Brooklyn City Newtown R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Spellman v. Lincoln Rapid Transit Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1893
- Topeka City Railway Co. v. HiggsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888
- Pray v. Omaha Street Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1895
- Fitzgerald v. Fitzgerald & Mallory Construction Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1894
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State ex rel. State Railway Commission v. RamseyNebraska Supreme Court · 1949
- Sikyta v. Arrow Stage Lines, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1991
- Lincoln Street Railway Co. v. McClellanNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
- Lincoln Traction Co. v. WebbNebraska Supreme Court · 1905
- Omaha & Council Bluffs Street Railway Co. v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1934
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.