Legal Opinion

Norrell v. Phenix City Public Transportation (MAG+)

District Court, M.D. Alabama

Decided July 17, 2025No. 3:24-cv-00411Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA EASTERN DIVISION LARRY JOE NORRELL, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) CASE NO. 3:24-cv-00411-RAH ) [WO] PHENIX CITY PUBLIC ) TRANSPORTATION, ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on the Motion to Dismiss (doc. 30) filed on behalf of the “Phenix City Public Transportation (PEX),” which is brought under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The motion is fully briefed and ripe for decision. For the following reasons, the motion will be granted. LEGAL STANDARD To avoid dismissal…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. John D. Dean v. David Barber, Mel Bailey, Jefferson County's Sheriff's DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API