Saley v. Black Panther Oil & Gas Co.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Oklahoma; Frank A. Youmans, Judge. Bill by the United States to cancel an allotment made to Barney Tho-locco, a citizen by blood of the Creek Tribe, in which the Black Panther Oil & Gas Company and another became interested. From an adverse decree, Saley, a Semillóle, roll No. 74, appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
LEWIS, Circuit Judge.
Appellant was permitted to intervene as a party i.n this cause after trial and decree between the original defendants and other interveners. The decree as between them was entered June 17, 1919, after a lengthy trial which began in the preceding December. The issues and nature of the controversy may be obtained from the opinion this day rendered in McKinney v. Black Panther Oil & Gas Co. et al., 280 Fed. 486, and need not be restated here. Appellant’s motion asking that she be permitted to come in was not filed and presented until May, 1920. In that motion, which was…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Porter v. SabinSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- White v. EwingSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Morgan's Louisiana & Texas Railroad & Steamship Co. v. Texas Central Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Swift v. Black Panther Oil & Gas Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1917
- United States v. WildcatSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. OwensCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1935
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company v. LongDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1963