Legal Opinion

Shaw v. . Sheldon

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 23, 1886PublishedCited by 20 opinions

This action was brought to recover damages for alleged negligence causing the death of Peter Shaw, plaintiff’s intestate. The deceased was a workman employed in defendant’s rolling-mill ; he stepped upon an iron tub (called a “ bosh ”) in the vicinity of the rollers, which were uncovered, and slipped off, one foot and leg passed between the revolving coupling of the rolls, causing the injuries of which he died.

Read the full summary

This action was brought to recover damages for alleged negligence causing the death of Peter Shaw, plaintiff’s intestate. The deceased was a workman employed in defendant’s rolling-mill ; he stepped upon an iron tub (called a “ bosh ”) in the vicinity of the rollers, which were uncovered, and slipped off, one foot and leg passed between the revolving coupling of the rolls, causing the injuries of which he died. The following is the mem. of opinion: “ The majority of the court are of opinion that this judgment should be reversed for the reason that the facts established, beyond dispute, that…

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam mem.

for reversal.

Rapallo, Andrews, Miller and Earl, JJ., concur; Roger, Ch. J., Finch and Danforth, JJ., dissent.

Judgment reversed.

2Cited by20 opinions

  1. Demars v. Glen Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1892
  2. Freeman v. Glens Falls Paper-Mill Co.New York Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Dieboldt v. United States Baking Co.New York Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Van Tassel v. New York, Lake Erie & Western RailroadNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1892
  5. Koehler v. Syracuse Specialty Manufacturing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API