Legal Opinion
Sap America, Inc. v. Royal Flowers, Inc.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided March 23, 2016No. 16-0022PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRothenberg, J.
SAP America, Inc. (“SAP”) petitions this Court seeking quashal of the trial court’s order granting Royal Flowers, Inc.’s (“Royal Flowers”) motion for leave to amend its complaint to assert a claim for punitive damages. ' Although it is clear that certiorari relief is an appropriate remedy to challenge a trial court’s order allowing a punitive damages claim to proceed when the procedural requirements of section 768.72, Florida Statutes (2015), have not been followed, see Globe Newspaper Co. v. King, 658 So.2d 518, 520 (Fla.1995); Coronado Condo. Ass’n v. La Corte, 103 So.3d 239, 240 (Fla. 3d…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Globe Newspaper Co. v. KingSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
- Coronado Condominium Ass'n v. CorteDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
- Ross Dress for Less Virginia, Inc. v. CastroDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
3Cited by5 opinions
- Varnedore v. CopelandDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
- Robins v. ColomboDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
- Levin v. Pritchard IIIDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
- MARK H. LEINBERGER and KYLE FORMAN v. JOEL MAGEEDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
- Rodriguez v. CopelandDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017