Walker v. North Jersey Street Railway Co.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On. error to the Supreme Court, whose decision was based upon the grounds set forth in the following memorandum: This was an action for personal injuries. The case made by the plaintiff was as follows: He was driving on Bloomfield avenue, a public road in the county of Essex leading from Newark to Bloomfield, on an evening in October, 1906, on the right-hand side of the road.
Read the full summary
On. error to the Supreme Court, whose decision was based upon the grounds set forth in the following memorandum: This was an action for personal injuries. The case made by the plaintiff was as follows: He was driving on Bloomfield avenue, a public road in the county of Essex leading from Newark to Bloomfield, on an evening in October, 1906, on the right-hand side of the road. Ahead of him was a slowly moving truck, and, for the purpose of passing it, he pulled his wagon to the left. The defendant company operates a double-track street railway through this avenue, and the plaintiff, when he…
1Per curiam
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the above memorandum.
For affirmance. — Tite Chancellor, Garrison, Reed, Trenohabd, Bergen, Yoorhees, Mintuen, Bogert, Vre-DENBURGH, YROOM, Dl LL, CONGDON, JJ. 12.
For reversal — Hone.
2Cited by3 opinions
- In Re AnonymousNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
- Riesen v. RiesenNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1929
- Palmore v. PalmoreSuperior Court of Delaware · 1951