Ross, Graham and Logan v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtMcHaney, J.
The prosecuting attorney filed with the clerk of the circuit court,- on June 19, 1931, three separate petitions, one against each appellant, to abate as a nuisance the business of each appellant. It was alleged that they were operating “snooker” halls or parlors in Booneville, in violation of the laws of the State; that gambling was permitted; that children under the age of 18 were permitted to play and loiter therein; that “snooker” parlors are in fact pool rooms operated under that name as a shield from its reality; that the reputation of such places is bad, and that they are kept open late…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Walls v. BrundidgeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1913
- State v. VaughanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
- Hester v. BourlandSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
- Marvel v. State ex rel. MorrowSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
- State v. SandersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Attorney General v. KarstonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1945
- Masterson v. State Ex Rel. BryantSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
- Masterson v. State Ex Rel. BryantSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
- Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1995
- Rogers v. St. Ex Rel., Robinson, Prosecuting Att'ySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937