Legal Opinion

Ross, Graham and Logan v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 12, 1931PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcHaney, J.

The prosecuting attorney filed with the clerk of the circuit court,- on June 19, 1931, three separate petitions, one against each appellant, to abate as a nuisance the business of each appellant. It was alleged that they were operating “snooker” halls or parlors in Booneville, in violation of the laws of the State; that gambling was permitted; that children under the age of 18 were permitted to play and loiter therein; that “snooker” parlors are in fact pool rooms operated under that name as a shield from its reality; that the reputation of such places is bad, and that they are kept open late…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Walls v. BrundidgeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1913
  2. State v. VaughanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
  3. Hester v. BourlandSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
  4. Marvel v. State ex rel. MorrowSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
  5. State v. SandersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Attorney General v. KarstonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1945
  2. Masterson v. State Ex Rel. BryantSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  3. Masterson v. State Ex Rel. BryantSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  4. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1995
  5. Rogers v. St. Ex Rel., Robinson, Prosecuting Att'ySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API