Legal Opinion · Dissent

Murray v. Michalak

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided May 10, 1971Published

1DissentProctor, J.

While I agree that the Appellate Division followed the tort law of this state in denying liability to the plaintiff, I must dissent because I think it is high time this Court reevaluated the law relating to sidewalk negligence cases.

On September 1, 1966, plaintiff, an elderly lady, while walking on the sidewalk in front of defendants’ property, tripped and fell and suffered injuries. She tripped on a flagstone slab which was raised about three and a half inches above the level of the adjoining slab. This elevation was caused by the root of a tree which was growing in a thirty-inch strip of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lohr v. Philipsburg BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  2. Dutton v. Lansdowne BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
  3. Mintzer v. GreenoughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
  4. Duncan v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
  5. Nash v. Atlantic White Tower System, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API