Wilson v. State Bar of Georgia
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HATCHETT, Chief Judge:
Appellants brought this lawsuit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claiming that two of the Rules and Regulations for the Organization and Government of the State Bar of Georgia, Standard 73 to Rule 4-102(d) and Rule 4-219(e)(2), constitute impermissible bills of attainder, abridge their First Amendment rights, and are void for vagueness under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The district court granted summary judgment for appellee State Bar of Georgia (“the State Bar”), and appellants now challenge the court’s rulings as to their First and Fourteenth…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Babbitt v. United Farm Workers National UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- National Organization for Women, Inc. v. ScheidlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Heather Kokesch Del Castillo v. Secretary, Florida Department of HealthCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2022
- Mason v. Florida BarCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
- Wollschlaeger v. FarmerDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2011
- Pittman v. ColeDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2000
- Bischoff v. Osceola County, FLCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.